How we got here, what changed, and what works now in 2026
Category creation isn't new. But the playbook has fundamentally changed. Here's how we got here:
Al Ramadan, Dave Peterson, Christopher Lochhead, and Kevin Maney published Play Bigger, codifying category design as a strategic discipline. Their thesis: companies that create and dominate categories capture disproportionate value (76% of market cap in their category). Their book became required reading if you were fundraising in Silicon Valley and rightly so.
What they got right: Categories matter more than products. The company that defines the category wins even if they don't have the "best" product.
What no longer works in 2026: The lightning strike launch model. Massive budgets. PR orchestration. Analyst relations. The idea that you "design" a category internally, then launch it with coordinated awareness campaigns.
April Dunford published Obviously Awesome, creating a rigorous framework for positioning. Her focus: how to position your product effectively within the market's existing understanding.
What she got right: Positioning is a strategic discipline. You need clarity on your differentiated value, your best-fit customers, and the market context that makes you the obvious choice.
What it doesn't solve: Positioning often assumes the category already exists. If you're competing in an established category, positioning helps you win share. But you're still paying the competition tax and fighting for scraps in someone else's category.
Social media evolved into interest media. Platforms stopped showing you content from people you follow and started showing you content based on what you're interested in. The algorithm became the distributor, not your network.
What changed for founders: You can't just post to your followers anymore. You need to create content that the algorithm recognizes as valuable to people interested in your problem space—whether they follow you or not. Reach became merit-based, not follower-based.
Why founder voice matters: In an interest-driven feed, authenticity is the only signal that cuts through AI-curated noise. Audiences engage with real perspectives and unique insights, not corporate messaging. The founder who consistently shares their category POV builds an audience that the algorithm actively distributes to interested parties.
AI becomes the platform. Technical capabilities become commodities. What took months to build now takes days. Network effects and data moats—once sustainable advantages—become table stakes just to survive.
What changed everything: Distribution shifted from gatekeepers (media, analysts, VCs) to direct founder-audience relationships. The "lightning strike" model died because you can't orchestrate attention anymore—you earn it through consistent narrative building.
The new reality: Categories don't emerge from orchestrated launches. They emerge from daily narrative velocity that transforms how markets think.
The synthesis. Category creation that works when AI has commoditized capability, when founders can ship faster than ever, when distribution is direct, and when the individual empire is the new default.
The approach: Build your category narrative in public. Daily. The category doesn't come from a deck—it comes from the accumulated weight of consistent narrative that transforms market thinking.
Play Bigger's insights about category importance were correct. But the how has fundamentally changed:
The fundamental insight—that categories matter more than products—remains true. The mechanism for creating them has completely changed.
You need all three. But each solves a different problem:
| Dimension | Play Bigger (2016) | Obviously Awesome (2019) | Amplified Narrative (2026) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Problem | How do we create and dominate a new category? | How do we position effectively in an existing category? | How do we create categories through narrative velocity in the AI era? |
| Primary Focus | Category design and orchestrated launches | Product positioning and differentiation | Daily narrative building and amplification |
| Distribution Model | PR, analysts, media gatekeepers | Assumes marketing/sales will execute positioning | Founder voice + interest-driven feeds (algorithm distributes to relevant audiences, not just followers) |
| Timeline | 18+ months with big reveal | Positioning sprint (weeks), then execute | Continuous, daily narrative building |
| Budget Required | $10M+ marketing budget, $200K-500K consultants | Workshop/consulting fees, existing marketing budget | Founder time + commitment to daily amplification |
| Who It's For | Well-funded startups, Series B+ | Any company needing positioning clarity | Any founder with a category insight to amplify |
| Assumes | Stability, time to orchestrate, gatekeeper access | Category framework exists, need differentiation | AI commoditization, direct distribution, rapid iteration |
| Success Metric | Category ownership, market cap dominance | Clear differentiation, sales effectiveness | Narrative velocity, market transformation speed |
| When to Use | Post-PMF, significant funding, enterprise focus | When messaging is unclear or sales struggles | When competing on features in commoditizing market |
| Retention Strategy | Assumes customers wait for full category vision | Positioning helps close deals, but doesn't address retention | Requires retention readiness—what keeps customers while you build the category |
Obviously Awesome and category creation aren't competing approaches—they're complementary:
Define the problem transformation. Identify what makes your approach categorically different (not incrementally better). Articulate the narrative shift required for customers to choose you.
This is your strategic foundation. Without it, you're positioning within someone else's category framework.
Apply Obviously Awesome's framework to articulate your differentiated value, identify your best-fit customers, and create messaging that makes your category POV obvious to the market.
This is your tactical execution. You know what category you're creating; now position yourself clearly within it.
Build your narrative in public. Daily founder-led content. Use market reaction to refine. Let the category emerge from the accumulated weight of consistent narrative building.
This is your category creation mechanism. No lightning strike. No 18-month consulting engagement. Just daily narrative velocity.
Your public narrative isn't marketing—it's R&D. Test ideas, refine positioning, discover resonance, invite co-creation.
Authenticity is the only signal that cuts through AI noise. The narrative must come from the founder because nobody else has the insight.
Don't guess whether your narrative works. Watch how it spreads. Measure how it transforms conversations. Iterate based on resonance.
You're not building for a category that will exist in two years. You're creating the category that must exist NOW—before the platform commoditizes your advantages.
If you're feeling overwhelmed by competing frameworks, here's the simple truth:
You need all three insights:
From Play Bigger: Categories matter more than products. Category kings capture disproportionate value. If you're competing in an existing category, you're fighting for scraps.
From Obviously Awesome: Positioning is a discipline. You need clarity on your differentiated value, your best-fit customers, and the market context that makes you the obvious choice.
From Amplified Narrative: Categories don't come from orchestrated launches anymore. They come from daily narrative building. The distribution channel is your voice. The mechanism is narrative velocity.
You don't need a massive budget. You don't need expensive consultants. You don't need 18 months.
You need a compelling category POV, the positioning clarity to make it obvious, and the commitment to amplify it daily.
That's the synthesis. That's what works in 2026.
Start with the frameworks that work in 2026.
Get the Category POV Canvas Take the Moat Velocity Assessment